It’s no secret that amazing founders and startups have access to an ample supply of venture capital in today’s market.
Debt is no exception. When used at the right time in an equity-backed business, debt is a great instrument to extend the cash runway of the business towards a better outcome.
Approximately two-thirds of the portfolio companies of a US venture capital firm with $5BN+ AUM have raised venture debt. In Europe, it’s a little over 10% of overall venture funding. Venture debt alongside equity is an option readily available but still underutilized in Europe today.
Although debt has existed as long as venture capital has in Europe (since the late 1990s), there are still common misconceptions about it and in certain geographies, a cultural aversion or ‘guilt’ against using this type of capital.
How do the business models of a VC and venture debt fund compare?
What is the decision-making framework and actions for European founders?
In a series of posts, I will discuss:
- Business model of VCs and venture debt funds
- Common use cases of venture debt (read here and here)
- Inherent ‘friction’ between founders, VCs, and lenders
- Debt structure and terms in Europe, including the ‘make whole provision’ (which tends to be mistakenly ignored during negotiations!)
- Key tips to successfully raise venture debt (read here and here)
Before diving into these topics, it’s worth noting that these posts are intended for anyone who is involved with a business which generates negative working capital and has a certain recurring pattern of growth (e.g. SaaS).